Business Ethics Codes And Standards Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Business Ethics Codes And Standards. Answer: Introduction In the daily life of each and every individual, they come across different ethical issues, where there is a need to make a decision regarding two alternative choices in which there is a need to make the right decision, particularly when making the wrong decision seems to be an easier and a profitable decision. Through ethics, which present the codes and standards, the decisions and behaviour of people is governed, based on the morality and values followed by such person. On the basis of trust, integrity and complex issues like diversity, governance and compliance, the ethical decisions are undertaken. When it comes to the businesses, they are faced with ethical decision making process quite often, and this have to be solved on the backdrop of ethical integrity. Through this discussion, the business ethics in context of the given case study have been analysed. Ethical Issues The case study highlighted a key ethical issue and this was related to the lack of a proper method being used for attaining the data of a competitor, in addition to the objectives of getting this information. The intelligence spying of competitors is deemed as an unethical manner of getting the confidential data of another company, for the benefit of the company in which the person works (Garfunkel, 2014). The competitive intelligence spying is deemed as unethical as the information of the competitor, which is attained by the company, is private and material information, which has the power of dismantling or gravely harming the competing company and by using this confidential information of the company, the other company can reap benefits. The competitive intelligence spying is also deemed as corporate espionage and is deemed as an unethical behaviour, the roots of which are in the information being gathered in such a way which is deemed as illegal. Where the loopholes of thelaw are taken advantage of, in order to consider it as a legal task, it still remains unethical due to the focus over the word of law, in place of the spirit oflaw (Ferrell, Fraedrich and Ferrell, 2016). The case study which has been given shows that the competitive information was obtained by the boss of Michael, as he hacked into the private intranet of the competitor, which is deemed as an illegal thing. Later on, the boss made a statement where the unethical conduct was again highlighted particularly for the manner in which the information had been attained by the boss. The reason for obtaining the information was to get the personal benefit for the company. As a result of this, the competitive intelligence spying, the ethical issue was raised in the given case (Daft and Samson, 2014). Requisite Steps to be undertaken by Michael The given case study shows that Michael was required to undertaken certain measures governed by the two ethical theories, i.e., utilitarianism and virtue ethics. As per the ethical theory of utilitarianism, such an act has to be undertaken through which the benefit of the majority is attained and the utility of the action is maximized (Bykvist, 2010). By following this theory, the actions are deemed right when the happiness is promoted and is spread between a high numbers of people. Through this theory, pleasure and happiness is deemed as the key values, which a true utilitarian upholds in their actions, through which the happiness of individuals is deemed as the main goal, instead of being focused on the happiness of a single or group of persons (Santa Carla University, 2014). The given case study shows that Michael has to adopt a true utilitarian approach and has to give supremacy to the happiness of the world, instead of the happiness of company where he works under the boss. And so, Michael is under the obligation to stop his boss from making a misuse of the other companys confidential information as the same does not result in happiness of the world, but just for the company. Based on the virtue ethics, the persons virtues in terms of character and mind of a person have to dictate the decisions which are made by the person. Based on this theory, the definition of virtue and nature of it is given supremacy. As a result of this, a virtuous person needs to show the qualities of honesty, courage, temperance, and justice to highlight good character (Winter, 2011). The given case shows that Michael had to act on the basis of this theory as a result of which, he was required to be honest, just, courageous and fair in the work done by him. This would have meant that instead of going forward with the orders of his boss, he would have taken strict steps and blown the whistle to curb the wrongdoing of the boss for upholding a sense of justice. Unethical Boss of Michael From the actions which have been undertaken by the boss of Michael, it can be clearly stated that he had undertaken unethical conduct. The reason for stating this is that he used the confidential information of its competitor and handed over the same to the subordinate for the benefit of his company. Apart from indulging in corporate espionage, he was very proud of his actions and even wanted the information to be used for the benefit of his company. The ethical theories of utilitarianism and virtue ethics again clarify that his actions were concentrated on his own benefits instead of that of the world; and in doing so, he was neither honest nor fair, thus lacking the virtuous character. And so, it can be stated with a definite clarity that Michaels boss was indulged in unethical conduct as he procured the material information of another company in unlawful manner and used it for the benefit of his company. Whistleblower: Michael The best manner of describing a whistleblower is such a person who expresses unlawful or unethical conduct, being indulged in by the company, for bringing forth the unethical conduct which is going on in the company, before the world. There are a number of statutory instruments through which the whistleblowers are protected and this is done in order to protect the person blowing the whistle, from discrimination or harassment. Hence, due to these legislations, a whistleblower cannot be removed or dismissed from the job and in some other company, they cannot be denied a job opportunity, just because they had been a whistleblower in past (Brown, 2008). There are number reasons which act as the motivating factor for the whistleblowers and this is more than mere monetary rationales (Waytz, 2016). The reward programs are brought forward by the government officials in order to bring forward to the notice of the government regarding the illegal activities. However, as per the conducted studies, the motivation of the whistleblowers lies in the physical wellbeing of the general public, instead of mere monetary gain (Alejandro, 2016). The whistleblowers are such people who give supremacy to the ethical theories and concentrate on these ethics in place of the financial benefits which are derived from being rewarded by the government. These individuals blow the whistle when they come across illegal or corrupt activities which the organizations undertake and of which, such individuals are a part (Alfred, 2016). One can justify whistle blowing by undertaking some particular conditions. It is important for the whistle blower to ensure before blowing the whistle, regarding the validity of the claims. This has to be coupled with the motives which are pure and genuine. Hence, where a whistle is blown as a result of an employee holding a grudge against the employee, the motive of the whistle blowing would not be justified or genuine for that matter. Whistle blowing has to be undertaken with the goal of bringing an end to the harm being caused to others and not harming the employer as a result of a grudge of an employee (Shaw, 2013). Whistle blowing is deemed as a very serious matter and is not to be taken lightly, as a result of the major repercussions attached with it. This is the reason why the whistleblowers are required to exhaust all the available alternatives, before they blow the whistle against the organization. This requires the whistleblower to attempt to settle the issue at hand in the company itself at the initial stages, where they discuss the matter with their superiors and with the relevant departments of the company. If a proper result is not obtained by undertaking or utilization of these resources, the whistleblower then should go ahead with whistle blowing process. As stated earlier, the whistleblowers are given different safeguards; though, they fail to prove useful and the whistleblowers have to bear the consequences of blowing the whistle. So, the whistle should only be blown in such cases where the person is okay with making some personal sacrifices and is ready to face certain hardships ( Vaughn, 2012). Relevance of Ethics in Business The ethics are deemed as significant when it comes to businesses and also with regards to their relevance to the conduct of business. An ethical company indulges in ethical practices, which allows the businesses to attract a higher customer base, in addition to employees and investors being attracted towards the company. The ethical companies are able to present a positive image before the customers which attracts the customers towards the products of such companies, in turn increasing the revenues of the company. The employees also want to be associated with such companies which conduct their operations in an ethical manner, as it helps in reducing the turnover of labour, and this again helps the company in raising their productivity. This also allows the companies to retain and attract staff, helping in increasing its talent pool, which brings down the costs of recruitment (ACCA, 2014). The ethical company also attract the faith of a higher number of investors, which results in more capital being available with the company and increases the share prices of the company, which overall results in the value of the company being raised. An ethical company also is able to attract the confidence of the regulatory bodies, as the government is often focused on unethical companies, in comparison to scrutinizing of the activities of an ethical company. Unethical behaviour spoils the reputation of the company, which results in the business having to suffer. And by being ethical, the company can continue on a path of growth (Minus, 2013). Conclusion From the discussion carried on the previous segments, it can be concluded that Michael was faced with an ethical dilemma due to the conduct of his boss being unethical. The boss had stolen the information of a competitor in an unlawful manner and wanted it to be used for the benefit of the company. However, the ethical theories required Michael to not follow the instructions of his boss and instead, blow the whistle. This would have resulted in the utility being maximized and ethics being upheld, as ethics are crucial for the growth of any company. References ACCA. (2014) Why is ethics important to business?. [Online] ACCA. Available from: https://blogs.accaglobal.com/2014/11/25/why-is-ethics-important-to-business/ [Accessed on: 21/10/17] Alejandro, H. (2016) What Motivates a Whistleblower?. [Online] Lexology. Available from: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=3708e644-10d0-488a-b00a-f8a21f5b2414 [Accessed on: 21/10/17] Alfred, C.F. (2016) Whistleblowers: Broken Lives and Organizational Power. New York: Cornell University. Brown, A.J. (2008) Whistleblowing in the Australian Public Sector: Enhancing the Theory and Practice of Internal Witness Management in Public Sector Organisations. Canberra: The Australian National University. Bykvist, K. (2010) Utilitarianism: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Daft, R.L. and Samson, D. (2014) Fundamentals of Management: Asia Pacific Edition PDF. 5th ed. South Melbourne: Cengage Learning Australia. Ferrell, O.C., Fraedrich, J., and Ferrell, L. (2016) Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making Cases. 11th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. Garfunkel, T. (2014) Is Competitive Intelligence Ethical?. [Online] Digitalist. Available from: https://www.digitalistmag.com/technologies/analytics/2014/11/20/competitive-intelligence-ethical-01792890 [Accessed on: 21/10/17] Minus, P.M. (2013) The Ethics of Business in a Global Economy. New York: Springer. Santa Carla University. (2014) Calculating Consequences: The Utilitarian Approach to Ethics. [Online] Santa Carla University. Available from: https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/calculating-consequences-the-utilitarian-approach/ [Accessed on: 21/10/17] Shaw, W.H. (2013) Business Ethics: A Textbook with Cases. 8th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. Vaughn, R.G. (2012) The Successes and Failures of Whistleblower Laws. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Waytz, A. (2016) Whistleblowers are Motivated by Moral Reasons Above Monetary Ones. [Online] Pro Market. Available from: https://promarket.org/whistleblowers-motivated-moral-reasons-monetary-ones/ [Accessed on: 21/10/17] Winter, M. (2011) Rethinking Virtue Ethics. New York: Springer.